Dear regulators, policymakers and other stakeholders:
I am a MFI client
from an urban slum, and yes I have taken loans from 2-3 MFIs operating in my
area. I do have a bank account, however, every time I have tried to use the
banking services, I found the entire process too complicated, and I have no
idea about bank Khatas or bank’s products. In addition, I do not find their staff
friendly or courteous. I remember the day when a MFI loan officer visited my house
asking if I needed any credit. My friends and neighbors were asked to make a
group and apply for the loans together. Why did I need credit at that time? I remembered that I had taken a loan from a moneylender
the previous month, and I thought I could use this MFI’s loan that had a lower
interest rate to pay the moneylender. At least that way I could save some
money, which, otherwise would have gone to the moneylender.
(Pic Source: Sushmita Meka. Note: Pic used only for representative purposes)
Another loan officer
came within a month and asked me if I needed a loan. I took that loan for my
children’s education. The next month, another loan officer came in our area and
again offered us credit. I took that loan too to fix the floor of my house, which we were planning for the last 3 years. That year was difficult for me as I had to attend 3 meetings every week. In
addition, I felt obligated to pay the installment for anyone in my group, who
was not able to make the payment. There were cases when some members ran away and
I had to pay their share. It was not an easy process for me. Had the banks
provided me an opportunity to save or take
loan to meet my credit needs for education, home improvement and others, I
would not have taken these micro loans from 3-4 MFIs and gone through this
process.
I heard that regulators
want us to use our loans for income generating purposes only. Could you please
describe what income generating purpose is? Some of my group members have been
running enterprises for the last 5 years, and I can understand them using these
loans for their business. I was not born an entrepreneur, and I do not have any
business. Hence, if I use this MFI loan for my children’s education-how is that
wrong? When I see non-poor people taking education loans and sending their
children to good schools and colleges in India and abroad so that their
children get good education, don’t you think, we poor want our children to get
good education too? How about health? If
my husband, who gets salary on a daily basis, is sick and not able to go to
work, can I not use some portion of that loan to take him to a doctor or a hospital.
Every day he misses his work, it affects our livelihoods. If I use the MFI loan
for home improvement, do you think it is wrong because we poor people cannot
have dreams to construct our own house. When non-poor can take a housing loan, why cannot I take loan from MFIs to construct my
own house?
I heard that the regulators
do not want MFIs to give loans if my annual household income is more than Rs.
1,20,000, which means, my monthly income should not be more than Rs. 10,000. My
HH income is more than Rs. 10,000/month, which makes me not eligible for a MFI
loan. However, if not MFIs, I have no option but to go to the nearby
moneylenders for loans. Had I been included in an effective banking system where I
could save, I could use my savings for all these routine or non-routine
expenditures. The bank official thinks he is doing me a huge favor by just letting
me enter his bank branch, and MFIs cannot take deposits. Where shall I save and
how? Without proper savings of my own, I do not have any option but to rely on credit whenever needed.
I heard that the regulators
do not want MFIs to provide more than Rs. 50,000 loan. If you want me to start
a new business, then Rs 50,000 is not enough to start any business. My neighbor
wanted to start a chicken business and she needed Rs. 1,50,000. Banks could not help her because she did not
have any ration card or other documents to fulfill their Know Your Customers (KYC)
norms, MFI loan officers told her that they could not provide her with a loan
over Rs 50,000, so she had no option but
to rely on moneylenders.
I request all
regulators, policymakers and bankers to visit our slums once in a while, to understand
our problems and then probably decide what we should do, and what not, how we
should use loans and how not. We need MFIs at this time because they are the
ones who are meeting our needs. If the Indian banking system works well and
gives us an opportunity to save, probably we will not even need credit.
However, till that happens, we have no option but to continue taking loans from
MFIs because moneylenders are more expensive.
Thank you
Regards
MFI client
This letter is based
on the anecdotes collected by the author during her interaction with clients in urban slums in Karnataka in January 2012

8 comments:
This is very informative story..
This is well written and conveys a good message. I hope the policy makers read it and actually use the information.
insightful & knowledgeable post.. lets hope that it gets read by our policy makers
Weakest Link
Looks that this is written by some one hoping to make money to exploit the current situation of micro finance without boundaries and rules, effectively a to lend more just because the there is no regulator on how they grant loan and collect. As we know that all are not in the boat as described in letter hence it would be better we analyze the situation in holistically for improving working framework instead of not having any.
I think we could better than present anecdotal evidence to policy makers. There have been objective studies(e.g. Banerjee et. al) on the impact of micro-credit in India. The proposed MFI regulations have some contentious clauses. I think the whole point should be to regulate the MFI sector, not to stifle it. Maybe the regulators should be encouraged to support research on the micro finance sector In India and use such and existing findings in policy making.
Deepti,
I agree with you. Similar are the anecdotes that I have come accross in teh field. Most of the poor welcome MFI loans since they are accessible, affordable and avilable in emergencies.
The above raised issues through a letter from a Client of MFI are genuine. I do agree with the client/s.
The regulators and the MFIs itself they have to think from the clients' perspective too. Please come out from the box.
Here in Nepal also, we have similar kind of issues for the MFI clients although Nepalese MFIs can mobilize savings from clients.
There are two major issues, one is access of financial services to the low income people and other is multiple lending resulted to over-indebtedness. Regulators and MFIs they have to address both issues cautiously.
"In general, borrowers are not defaulters, MFIs' product and systems create defaulters."
Mango Classifieds - Free Classifieds from 8000+ cities of India in various categories
like Services, Jobs, Electronics,Automobiles,Real Estate, Pets, Courses, Appliances,
Agriculture, Travel Packages, Restaurents, Agents, Coaching Centers and more
Post a Comment