India’s massive agricultural sector employs about 60% of the population, yet accounts for only about 17% of total GDP. Growth in agriculture has stagnated relative to other sectors: last year the agricultural sector grew at a rate of 2.7%, relative to 11% growth in both the service and industry sector. Agricultural incomes are lower and growing slower than incomes in other sectors. The government has a clear imperative to seriously examine whether existing policies are optimal.
There is a staggering amount of literature analyzing agricultural policy in India. From my admittedly cursory review I noticed several recurring themes, which I discuss in no particular order:
1. Increase farmer’s access to markets.
The World Bank cites an “almost universal lack of good extension services” to farmers as a major factor inhibiting growth. In addition to the miserable infrastructure in many rural areas, the inability of farmers to directly access markets has sustained the presence of a chain of middlemen through whom most agricultural commodities must circulate before finally reaching consumers. Many SHGs have, with great success, arranged cooperatives that bypass such middlemen and sell directly to wholesalers. The government should learn from the success of such initiatives and try to help streamline the agricultural commodity supply chain.
2. Improve agricultural productivity.
In spite of the gains of the Green Revolution, Indian agriculture lags behind in terms of technology take-up and production efficiency. Lack of access to credit, which we discussed earlier, may be one of the factors inhibiting farmers from investing in technology. However, the ground reality also suggests that poor education and lack of awareness of the benefits of new technology is also a factor. In addition, the epic and recurring issue of poor irrigation and infrastructure is widely recognized as a drain on productivity in many regions (Its estimated that about 10% of all agricultural production in India is wasted due to lack of storage, transport, etc). The government already proved itself capable of stimulating advances in agricultural productivity with the Green Revolution. Future policies should focus on providing incentives to farmers to adopt better production technology, bridging the information gap that currently exists in the agricultural sector, and remedying severe underdevelopment of irrigation and infrastructure facilities.
3. Reconsider distortionary subsidies and other policies.
Currently, the Indian government sets a minimum support price for almost all agricultural commodities. Farmers who produce various goods are guaranteed the option of selling directly to the government at a price fixed in the beginning of the season. The stated goal of this policy is to “ensuring remunerative prices to the growers for their produce with a view to (sic) encouraging higher investment and production.” The inherent endogeneity of MSP policy makes a rigorous impact assessment difficult, but the persistently low productivity growth in agriculture suggests that the MSP policies have failed to stimulate sufficient capital investments by farmers. Its conceivable the virtual subsidy provided by MSPs might actually dampen incentives for technology take-up by guaranteeing a basic level of income security. Furthermore, the existence of MSPs may encourage agricultural production for which there is actually limited demand in private markets, leading to unbalanced and suboptimal production choices by individual farmers. The process by which which MSPs are set is also somewhat dubious, and many have suggested that the current price-setting system is vulnerable to political manipulation and lack of parity across goods. Although scrapping MSPs would obviously expose a large number of farmers to the risk of price shocks, it seems to me that improving farmers access to insurance products and commodity futures markets is more sustainable and optimal way to manage such risks.
4. Improve public education.
Even if agricultural productivity does increase, it is still likely to lag behind the explosive IT and service sectors. However, the public education system is clearly failing to provide rural children with the skills necessary to enter these labor markets. This is perhaps the single biggest factor inhibiting the transition from agriculture to service sector employment. The demand for skilled workers in India has exploded, particularly in the service sector, demand which many firms are finding difficult to meet domestically due to extremely skewed distribution of human capital (something Doug discussed in the previous post).
5. Promote non-farm entrepreneurship among farmers.
Although India’s rural poor are by and large uneducated, many of them are capable of operating small businesses that have higher returns than traditional agriculture. However, their ability to start such business is often hampered by lack of access to credit and capital. In spite of the microfinance “revolution” and government policies designed to stimulate capital flow to the rural population (such as priority sector lending), there is still a massive failure of credit markets to meet the demands of the rural population. Empirical research has demonstrated that returns to capital are extremely high in microenterprises (roughly 80% in Sri Lanka), which of course suggests that there is tremendous potential for farmers who start operating small businesses to supplement or replace their primary line of work.
I’d be interested in hearing peoples opinions on any of these issues, and think this discussion would particularly benefit from the observations of people working in rural ares.
13 comments:
Really interesting thoughts!
In addition to these I would add that adopting the model APMC reform act by those states which have yet to do so, investing in transportation infrastructure (which the government is making an admirable effort to do with PMGSY), and passage of the bill currently in parliament which would allow warehouse receipts to be traded as negotiable instruments are also crucial steps. In India, farm gate prices are only a fraction of the end retail price paid by the consumer for most crops. Among the key reasons for this are a) roads and other key transportation infrastructure are lacking b) due to restrictions in state APMC laws farmers are legally barred from selling directly to consumers and c) there is a lack of warehousing facilities. These steps would do a lot to correct these problems.
Also, I'm a bit less convinced that minimum support prices are such a bad thing. They are certainly problematic in that they can easily transform into entitlements in the eyes of those who rely on them, yet given farmers immense susceptibility to price risk there is a still a strong case for leaving them intact.
I would like to share a few thoughts around your second point about improving agricultural productivity – firstly in relation to the idea of technology transfer to farmers and secondly in relation to production efficiency and the Green Revolution.
1. Technology Transfer
Agriculture is often reduced to technical practices of farmers. From an agricultural development perspective this becomes the adoption or rejection of technology normally sourced externally. Thus, despite considerable criticism, the technology transfer model of knowledge generation and dissemination for agriculture remains the dominant form of agricultural engagement. This follows a pre-designed pattern with farmers as passive recipients, government extension staff and other outsiders as conduits and agricultural researches as generators. This model of agricultural extension assumes a uni-directional and descending flow of information from research staff at the top to farmers at the bottom.
On the other hand the idea that indigenous agricultural knowledge, suppressed by the advance of modern, scientific agricultural techniques, can provide a solution to the problems confronting resource poor farmers in developing countries has been gaining momentum. What is important to note is that farmers have knowledge and that this is embodied in their practice. New problems require different solutions and this may be met within the existing repertoire of farmers’ practices or may require the intervention of agricultural researchers collaborating globally. It is a mistake to disregard local endogenous knowledge just as it is a mistake to assume that all problems – although some may - need an exogenous solution.
2. Production efficiency and the Green Revolution
The Green Revolution was premised on the idea that in combination the use of improved seed varieties, fertiliser, pesticides and irrigation could raise crop yields on an unprecedented scale. That this succeeded in parts of South Asia and South America should not distract us from the impact of such production systems. Increased use of water has depleted underground water supplies thus lowering the water table, increased use of fertiliser and pesticides has led numerous health and environmental problems, and the increased use of a narrow range of improved varieties has led to crop uniformity with a decline in agricultural biodiversity. The responsiveness of crops to the increased use of fertilisers is in decline resulting in lower input/output ratio.
Dan Taylor
Director – Find Your Feet
Good to know your inputs on indian agriculture. With respect to ur comment on adoption of new technologies and green revolution, though there is no doubt that green revolution did bring benefits in the immediate future, increased use of pesticide and chemicals have created enormous water and land fertility problems to the small and marginal farmers over the past decade. Dr M S who is considered the father of green revolution has been recently advocating organic farming. The case of Bt cotton which increases the input cost tremendously without bringing higher output yield in places like vidarbha has been seeing an ever increasing rate of suicide (though this is not the only reason). So higher productivity does not necessarily come with new technologies. Technologies have to be appropriate, cheap, use less water and improve land fertility rather than modern/ imported from US.
Also considering the low price that the farmers have been getting for their crops, it will be harsh to label policies like MSP as a distortionary subsidy. That too, looking at the billions of dollars of subsidy that developed countries provide, what we provide our farmers are no where near.
The major problem faced by the Indian Agriculture is that the number of people working on field are more than the land available.
-------------
Angel
Blazeinfotech
Please watch the video:
AGRICULTURE GOING TO SEED
produced by school going children of rural Andhra Pradesh
http://www.viddler.com/explore/CAMP/videos/24/
Opportunity to Learn
Just as I can point to lack on joy and motivation, I can point to adult learners that preferred to be guided. I can also point to situations where the instruction did not meet the initial needs articulated by the learners because the instruction itself changed the learner's and their stated needs………….
hello,,
i thing so change to aruicuture !
kanyakumari
passage of the bill currently in parliament which would allow warehouse receipts to be traded as negotiable instruments are also crucial steps
nice...!
Beautifully written :)
Nice post. It seems so possible, but why is no one doing anything about it?
Wonderful article!
Good that government has taken preventive measures. Beautifully written post.
Post a Comment